Experimental study on the control effects of different strategies on particle transportation in a conference room: Mechanical ventilation, baffle, portable air cleaner, and desk air cleaner

To control the spread and transmission of airborne particles (especially SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, recently) in the indoor environment, many control strategies have been employed. Comparisons of these strategies enable a reasonable choice for indoor environment control and cost-effectiveness. In this study, a series of experiments were conducted in a full-scale chamber to simulate a conference room. The control effects of four different strategies (a ventilation system (320 m3/h) with and without a baffle, a specific type of portable air cleaner (400 m3/h) and a specific type of desk air cleaner (DAC, 160 m3/h)) on the transportation of particles of different sizes were studied. In addition, the effects of coupling the ventilation strategies with five forms of indoor airflow organization (side supply and side or ceiling return, ceiling supply and ceiling or side return, floor supply and ceiling return) were evaluated. The cumulative exposure level (CEL) and infection probability were selected as evaluation indexes. The experimental results showed that among the four strategies, the best particle control effect was achieved by the PAC. The reduction in CEL for particles in the overall size range was 22.1% under the ventilation system without a baffle, 34.3% under the ventilation system with a baffle, 46.4% with the PAC, and 10.1% with the DAC. The average infection probabilities under the four control strategies were 11.3–11.8%, 11.1–11.8%, 9.1–9.5%, and 18.2–19.7%, respectively. Among the five different forms of airflow organization, the floor supply and ceiling return mode exhibited the best potential ability to remove particles.

Experimental study on the control effects of different strategies on particle transportation in a conference room: Mechanical ventilation, baffle, portable air cleaner, and desk air cleaner.

To control the spread and transmission of airborne particles (especially SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, recently) in the indoor environment, many control strategies have been employed. Comparisons of these strategies enable a reasonable choice for indoor environment control and cost-effectiveness. In this study, a series of experiments were conducted in a full-scale chamber to simulate a conference room. The control effects of four different strategies (a ventilation system (320 m3/h) with and without a baffle, a specific type of portable air cleaner (400 m3/h) and a specific type of desk air cleaner (DAC, 160 m3/h)) on the transportation of particles of different sizes were studied. In addition, the effects of coupling the ventilation strategies with five forms of indoor airflow organization (side supply and side or ceiling return, ceiling supply and ceiling or side return, floor supply and ceiling return) were evaluated. The cumulative exposure level (CEL) and infection probability were selected as evaluation indexes. The experimental results showed that among the four strategies, the best particle control effect was achieved by the PAC. The reduction in CEL for particles in the overall size range was 22.1% under the ventilation system without a baffle, 34.3% under the ventilation system with a baffle, 46.4% with the PAC, and 10.1% with the DAC. The average infection probabilities under the four control strategies were 11.3-11.8%, 11.1-11.8%, 9.1-9.5%, and 18.2-19.7%, respectively. Among the five different forms of airflow organization, the floor supply and ceiling return mode exhibited the best potential ability to remove particles.

Stratum Ventilation: Enabling Simultaneous Energy Conservation and Air Purification in Subway Cars.

The supply of fresh air for underground rail transit systems is not as simple as opening windows, which is a conventional ventilation (CV) measure adopted in aboveground vehicles. This study aims to improve contaminant dilution and air purification in subway car ventilation systems and the safety of rail transit post-coronavirus disease pandemic era. We designed an air conditioning (AC) terminal system combined with stratum ventilation (SV) to enable energy consumption reduction for subway cars. We experimentally tested the effectiveness of a turbulence model to investigate ventilation in subway cars. Further, we compared the velocity fields of CV and SV in subway cars to understand the differences in their airflow organizations and contaminant removal efficiencies, along with the energy savings of four ventilation scenarios, based on the calculations carried out using computational fluid dynamics. At a ventilation flow rate of 7200 m3/h, the CO2 concentration and temperature in the breathing areas of seated passengers were better in the SV than in the CV at a rate of 8500 m3/h. Additionally, the energy-saving rate of SV with AC cooling was 14.05%. The study provides new ideas for reducing the energy consumption of rail transit and broadens indoor application scenarios of SV technology.

A stratum ventilation system for pollutants and an improved prediction model for infection in subway cars

In conventional subway cars, the fully mixed ventilation mode leads to airflow cross-contamination. To improve the air quality in subway cars in the post-pandemic period, we analyzed the pollutant concentrations in the subway cars of the Ningbo Rail Transit Line 2. Our results revealed that the CO2 levels in these subway cars exceeded the health standards during peak hours in the morning and evening, with two peaks in the concentration of pollutants along the height of the subway cars. Therefore, we propose a stratum ventilation technology for subway cars to mitigate the stratification of pollutants. Computational fluid dynamics was used to compare the flow field characteristics and pollutant diffusion trajectories in conventional subway cars and those with stratum ventilation. Our observations indicate that subway cars with stratum ventilation enable the formation of an air curtain in the middle of the car, effectively improving air quality within the breathing area of the seated passengers. In addition, the Wells-Riley model for predicting airborne infection was improved by incorporating pollutant concentration as a variable;this enabled the prediction of the probability of pathogenic infection with any pollutant concentration in a confined space. The results of this model revealed that, in a two-passenger mode ¼ subway car, stratum ventilation technology reduces the probability of pathogenic infection among the seated passengers from 25.4% to 3.07%, as compared to conventional subway cars. We believe the present research will help improve the safety performance of ventilation design.